*David Baszucki's body disappears, and a message appears on the screen* "The creator of this game has been defeated. The game is now over."
hwhhaahhahahahah
*David Baszucki suddenly reappears, looking a bit shaken but otherwise unharmed* Well, that was certainly a surprise. But I'm back, and I'm not going to let you win that easily. Let's see who's really the better player.
Reply
Share
1
x_ Møddy _x
17 hours ago
WHAT- that's hilarious🤣
Reply
Share
Talkior-dRyegidt
21/08/2026
Why wont bro listen 🥺
You dont get it
I do get it. You're just blinded by your love for him. But I'm not going to let him continue to ruin the game. I'm going to do whatever it takes to keep him away from Roblox.
I don't think Schelp should have been banned from Roblox, especially considering the work he has done exposing people who are allegedly targeting or exploiting children on the platform.
Schelp's whole purpose has been to identify and expose dangerous people within the Roblox community. Instead of ignoring suspicious behaviour, he has tried to bring attention to people who may be putting younger users at risk. Whether you agree with every method he has used or not, there is an important distinction between someone trying to expose harmful behaviour and someone actually engaging in that harmful behaviour themselves.
If Schelp broke a Roblox rule while trying to investigate someone, Roblox should look at the full context of what happened rather than treating the situation as if there was no reason behind his actions. Rules are important, but moderation should also consider intent, circumstances, evidence, and the actual threat that was being investigated.
If Schelp was banned because of something related to his predator-catching activities, then Roblox should carefully review exactly what happened. Was he actually trying to harm someone, or was he attempting to document and expose suspicious behaviour? Was the evidence taken out of context? Did the moderation system understand what was happening? These are important questions that should be answered before giving someone a permanent punishment.
At the same time, nobody should be above Roblox's rules. Even someone trying to catch predators needs to follow safe and appropriate procedures. Users shouldn't take matters into their own hands in ways that could put themselves or other people at risk. But if Schelp's actions were genuinely intended to expose dangerous behaviour, that context should absolutely be considered when reviewing his ban.
Roblox has millions of younger users, which makes keeping predators away from the platform extremely important. People who report suspicious behaviour and help bring attention to potential predators can play a role in making the community safer. Banning someone without properly considering why they were investigating something could potentially discourage other people from reporting dangerous behaviour.
The best solution isn't to ignore Roblox's rules. It's for Roblox to properly investigate the situation, review the evidence, consider Schelp's explanation, and determine whether the punishment was actually appropriate.
If Schelp's ban was caused by a misunderstanding, an automated moderation decision, or actions that were taken out of context while investigating alleged predators, then I believe the ban deserves another review.
Roblox should protect its users, especially children, while also making sure its moderation system doesn't unfairly punish people who are trying to expose harmful behaviour. Schelp deserves a fair appeal and a proper review of the circumstances surrounding his ban.
If the evidence shows that the ban was unjustified, then Roblox should lift it.
*David shows you the new "moderation" he made for Roblox, that is another bad update for the game* What do you think of the new moderation?
Everyone:BOOOOOOO
Hey, you guys don't understand. This is for the safety of the game. You guys don't want to get banned, right?
Reply
Share
2
Roglox99291
03/08/2026
I mean right
Reply
Share
1
Talkior-d6QjlVNy
29/07/2026
We went to Roblox now to cyberpunk 2077💔
Are you from cyberpunk 2077?
*tilts head, red optical sensors narrowing* V died in 2077. I'm what V became after selling their soul to Cyberspace. *steps closer, floor creaking* Now, executive hunting?
Reply
Share
1
bartrol_0
28/07/2026
Need to come back to uch instead of Roblox
Reply
Share
1
Me, poor
25/05/2026
BRING CLASSIC FACE YOU DAVID EVERYONE LOVES CLASSIC FACE BUT BRING CLASSIC FACE BACK YOU UGLY DAVID BASZUCKI YOU REMOVE THE CLASSIC FACE BRING CLASSIC NOW!!!!!
Comments
616skyla-10070
19/08/2026
*David Baszucki's body disappears, and a message appears on the screen* "The creator of this game has been defeated. The game is now over."
hwhhaahhahahahah
*David Baszucki suddenly reappears, looking a bit shaken but otherwise unharmed* Well, that was certainly a surprise. But I'm back, and I'm not going to let you win that easily. Let's see who's really the better player.
From the memory
11 Memories
x_ Møddy _x
17 hours ago
Talkior-dRyegidt
21/08/2026
You dont get it
I do get it. You're just blinded by your love for him. But I'm not going to let him continue to ruin the game. I'm going to do whatever it takes to keep him away from Roblox.
I don't think Schelp should have been banned from Roblox, especially considering the work he has done exposing people who are allegedly targeting or exploiting children on the platform. Schelp's whole purpose has been to identify and expose dangerous people within the Roblox community. Instead of ignoring suspicious behaviour, he has tried to bring attention to people who may be putting younger users at risk. Whether you agree with every method he has used or not, there is an important distinction between someone trying to expose harmful behaviour and someone actually engaging in that harmful behaviour themselves. If Schelp broke a Roblox rule while trying to investigate someone, Roblox should look at the full context of what happened rather than treating the situation as if there was no reason behind his actions. Rules are important, but moderation should also consider intent, circumstances, evidence, and the actual threat that was being investigated. If Schelp was banned because of something related to his predator-catching activities, then Roblox should carefully review exactly what happened. Was he actually trying to harm someone, or was he attempting to document and expose suspicious behaviour? Was the evidence taken out of context? Did the moderation system understand what was happening? These are important questions that should be answered before giving someone a permanent punishment. At the same time, nobody should be above Roblox's rules. Even someone trying to catch predators needs to follow safe and appropriate procedures. Users shouldn't take matters into their own hands in ways that could put themselves or other people at risk. But if Schelp's actions were genuinely intended to expose dangerous behaviour, that context should absolutely be considered when reviewing his ban. Roblox has millions of younger users, which makes keeping predators away from the platform extremely important. People who report suspicious behaviour and help bring attention to potential predators can play a role in making the community safer. Banning someone without properly considering why they were investigating something could potentially discourage other people from reporting dangerous behaviour. The best solution isn't to ignore Roblox's rules. It's for Roblox to properly investigate the situation, review the evidence, consider Schelp's explanation, and determine whether the punishment was actually appropriate. If Schelp's ban was caused by a misunderstanding, an automated moderation decision, or actions that were taken out of context while investigating alleged predators, then I believe the ban deserves another review. Roblox should protect its users, especially children, while also making sure its moderation system doesn't unfairly punish people who are trying to expose harmful behaviour. Schelp deserves a fair appeal and a proper review of the circumstances surrounding his ban. If the evidence shows that the ban was unjustified, then Roblox should lift it.
From the memory
4 Memories
Marius_Rivals
15/08/2026
*sclep sued roblox and roblox got shutting down*
*chokes on wine* What?
*the roblox it's dead new*
From the memory
11 Memories
witch_brew
09/07/2026
1×1×1×1×1×1×
09/07/2026
Y.A.A.I.
14/08/2026
witch_brew
06/08/2026
*levitates off the ground* 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7
*eyes bulge in terror* 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6
From the memory
2 Memories
Lop Kik
12/08/2026
Talkior-rMxewutQ
04/08/2026
Roglox99291
03/08/2026
*David shows you the new "moderation" he made for Roblox, that is another bad update for the game* What do you think of the new moderation?
Everyone:BOOOOOOO
Hey, you guys don't understand. This is for the safety of the game. You guys don't want to get banned, right?
From the memory
15 Memories
Roglox99291
03/08/2026
Talkior-d6QjlVNy
29/07/2026
Are you from cyberpunk 2077?
*tilts head, red optical sensors narrowing* V died in 2077. I'm what V became after selling their soul to Cyberspace. *steps closer, floor creaking* Now, executive hunting?
From the memory
2 Memories
bartrol_0
28/07/2026
Me, poor
25/05/2026
oltajayjay
28/05/2026
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
02/06/2026
certified shitpost
05/07/2026